Cyber Security automation has a massive upside, improving accuracy and efficiency while reducing the amount of redundancy and incidence. However, I am leaning more to disagreeing with cyber security automation “leveling” the playing field. We still need sys and network admins to monitor and maintain said programs. The amount of risk and consequences still persist. Attackers are always on the clock and they won’t be waiting for the automated security to keep up with them. Matter of fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if they manipulate the defenses. How do we, as users, know if we’re under attack when the automated security doesn’t react or report any breach? Lastly, I want to point out is the “human error” into utilizing an AI focused defense system, which the automated system itself depends on the sys admin’s configuration ability. One misstep or mistake can be catastrophic (not too dramatic).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Week 10 Posting - Cloud Automation
For the final week of class, we learned about cloud automation and using common terminology that are used in automation services and techniq...
-
Virtual network interface controllers or vNICs physically and virtually connect the virtual machine to other neighboring machines (West, 202...
-
This week, the class and I went over the topic of cloud storage and identifying multiple types of data types stored in the cloud. In the rea...
-
This week, the class and I learned how to manage cloud capacity and performance. One of our weekly objectives is to describe the relevance...
No comments:
Post a Comment